"
Rapporteur of resources, Fux diverged only three times the monthly allowance
Barbosa
In 112 votes
on 37 defendants , who else Fux was followed rapporteur action .
Ricardo
Lewandowski Chartered bucked Joaquim Barbosa 47 times .
Mariana
OliveiraDo G1 in Brasilia
20 ? 09/
2013
The Justice
Luiz Fux , who is the rapporteur noSupremo Court (STF ) resources that allow
new trial for 12 convicts in the process of the monthly allowance , only
disagreed with the rapporteur of the criminal action , Minister Joaquim Barbosa
, on three occasions during the trial on 112 votes last year, which ended with
25 convictions and 12 acquittals .
According to
a survey of the G1 , Fux was the minister who followed more Joaquim Barbosa ,
identified by lawyers as the magistrate harder punishments in defending those
accused of involvement in the scheme , according to the Supreme consisted of
buying votes of parliamentarians allied base during the early years of the
government of former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva .
Although Fux
was the minister more aligned with the positions of Barbosa , the fact that he
was the rapporteur of the new features , so-called embargoes infringing ,
necessarimente not mean a disadvantage for the defendants , since decisions on
convictions depend on the votes of all ministers .
SEE HOW MANY
TIMES EACH MINISTER diverged BARBOSA NO Mensalão
Ricardo
Lewandowski
47
Dias Toffoli
39
Rosa Weber
29
Marco
Aurélio Mello
27
Carmen Lucia
25
Gilmar
Mendes
9
Celso de
Mello 7
Ayres Britto
6
Luiz Fux 3
Cezar Peluso
( attended only 24 of 112 votes ) 2
As its name
indicates , the rapporteur is the minister who makes a report to the other
applications of defense and prosecution arguments . Then he presents his own
vote, which is the basis for the manifestation of other ministers who can bring
new arguments and say whether they agree or disagree with the rapporteur's
position .
The minister
further antagonized the rapporteur Joaquim Barbosa in the trial of the monthly
allowance was Ricardo Lewandowski , reviewer of prosecution ; With it , Barbosa
caught váriosembates rough and discussions during the nearly five -month trial
last year . At the trial of infringing embargoes , no reviewer - only
rapporteur .
Luiz Fux was
drawn from nine ministers to be the originator of infringing embargoes - not
part of the draw Barbosa and Lewandowski reviewer and rapporteur for being the
criminal . These embargoes apply to the 12 convicts who had at least four votes
in favor and with this feature may try to reverse convictions for conspiracy
and money laundering .
After the Supreme
considered valid the feature that allows retrial and before being defined who
would be the new rapporteur, Marcelo Leonardo lawyer who defends Marcos Valerio
, said that "any " other minister of the Supreme would be better for
those convicted of what Barbosa .
" Any
minister will be better than Joaquim Barbosa . Everyone saw the conduct of
proceedings by him . This [ say no favors ] would deny the obvious ," said
the lawyer .
Once you
know what would be the rapporteur Fux resources , said Leonardo maintains the
view even taking into account that Luiz Fux did most of the votes followed
Barbosa .
" I
maintain my position . 's Different voting on condition vowel ( minister who is
neither statutory nor rapporteur ) and the rapporteur. A big difference is that
the Justice Luiz Fux is career magistrate , lawyers receive , receives
memorials . 's Another situation , "he told G1 .
Joaquim
Barbosa has publicly stated more than once that considers promiscuous relations
between judges and lawyers and that only gets defense lawyers in the presence
of the prosecutor .
112 votes on
the various reported crimes by prosecutors Fux only diverged from Joaquim
Barbosa regarding the former leader of the Rural Bank Ayanna Tenorio , in
charge of mismanagement , and on charges of tax evasion and partner Zilmar
contraDuda Mendonça Fernandes . In all three cases , Barbosa voted for
conviction and Fux , for acquittals .
During the
trial last year , Fux called crimes of the monthly allowance " megadelitos
" and even said that the Rural Bank served as " a veritable laundry
money."
" The
banking entity served as a real laundry money, this should be the name , or
mismanagement , or reckless management , management should be dark . "
celerity
On Thursday
( 19 ) Fux said through a statement that you want to bring to trial the plenary
embargoes infringers " as soon as all parties to manifest ."
He referred
to the period for which the defendants present appeal, after the publication of
the judgment of the first resources , and the opinion of the federal
prosecutors on the subject .
The judgment
is the document that summarizes the decisions taken and , by statute , must be
published within 60 days , or until November . After publication , the
condemned may submit infringing within 30 days . Then the prosecutor will have
another 15 days to present its position .
Only after
the outbreak of the parties ( defense and prosecution ) , which Fux , as
rapporteur , will check if the offender has obtained at least four affirmative
votes and if the feature is on schedule . Afterwards, you can still ask if you
find new evidence needed to make a vote . The next step is to take the case to
trial in plenary. This analysis phase has no pre-determined time and duration
depends only on himself relator .
The decision
on keeping or not punishments or penalties will be the plenary of the Supreme ,
ie , the set of 11 ministers , which features two new judges in relation to the
composition that judged the case last year , Teori Zavascki”
Access:
20.09.2013
The Justice
Luiz Fux , who is the rapporteur noSupremo Court (STF ) resources that allow
new trial for 12 convicts in the process of the monthly allowance , only
disagreed with the rapporteur of the criminal action , Minister Joaquim Barbosa
, on three occasions during the trial on 112 votes last year, which ended with
25 convictions and 12 acquittals .
According to
a survey of the G1 , Fux was the minister who followed more Joaquim Barbosa ,
identified by lawyers as the magistrate harder punishments in defending those
accused of involvement in the scheme , according to the Supreme consisted of
buying votes of parliamentarians allied base during the early years of the
government of former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva .
Although Fux
was the minister more aligned with the positions of Barbosa , the fact that he
was the rapporteur of the new features , so-called embargoes infringing ,
necessarimente not mean a disadvantage for the defendants , since decisions on
convictions depend on the votes of all ministers .
SEE HOW MANY
TIMES EACH MINISTER diverged BARBOSA NO Mensalão
Ricardo
Lewandowski
47
Dias Toffoli
39
Rosa Weber
29
Marco
Aurélio Mello
27
Carmen Lucia
25
Gilmar
Mendes
9
Celso de
Mello 7
Ayres Britto
6
Luiz Fux 3
Cezar Peluso
( attended only 24 of 112 votes ) 2
As its name
indicates , the rapporteur is the minister who makes a report to the other
applications of defense and prosecution arguments . Then he presents his own
vote, which is the basis for the manifestation of other ministers who can bring
new arguments and say whether they agree or disagree with the rapporteur's
position .
The minister
further antagonized the rapporteur Joaquim Barbosa in the trial of the monthly
allowance was Ricardo Lewandowski , reviewer of prosecution ; With it , Barbosa
caught váriosembates rough and discussions during the nearly five -month trial
last year . At the trial of infringing embargoes , no reviewer - only
rapporteur .
Luiz Fux was
drawn from nine ministers to be the originator of infringing embargoes - not
part of the draw Barbosa and Lewandowski reviewer and rapporteur for being the
criminal . These embargoes apply to the 12 convicts who had at least four votes
in favor and with this feature may try to reverse convictions for conspiracy
and money laundering .
After the Supreme
considered valid the feature that allows retrial and before being defined who
would be the new rapporteur, Marcelo Leonardo lawyer who defends Marcos Valerio
, said that "any " other minister of the Supreme would be better for
those convicted of what Barbosa .
" Any
minister will be better than Joaquim Barbosa . Everyone saw the conduct of
proceedings by him . This [ say no favors ] would deny the obvious ," said
the lawyer .
Once you
know what would be the rapporteur Fux resources , said Leonardo maintains the
view even taking into account that Luiz Fux did most of the votes followed
Barbosa .
" I
maintain my position . 's Different voting on condition vowel ( minister who is
neither statutory nor rapporteur ) and the rapporteur. A big difference is that
the Justice Luiz Fux is career magistrate , lawyers receive , receives
memorials . 's Another situation , "he told G1 .
Joaquim
Barbosa has publicly stated more than once that considers promiscuous relations
between judges and lawyers and that only gets defense lawyers in the presence
of the prosecutor .
112 votes on
the various reported crimes by prosecutors Fux only diverged from Joaquim
Barbosa regarding the former leader of the Rural Bank Ayanna Tenorio , in
charge of mismanagement , and on charges of tax evasion and partner Zilmar
contraDuda Mendonça Fernandes . In all three cases , Barbosa voted for
conviction and Fux , for acquittals .
During the
trial last year , Fux called crimes of the monthly allowance " megadelitos
" and even said that the Rural Bank served as " a veritable laundry
money."
" The
banking entity served as a real laundry money, this should be the name , or
mismanagement , or reckless management , management should be dark . "
celerity
On Thursday
( 19 ) Fux said through a statement that you want to bring to trial the plenary
embargoes infringers " as soon as all parties to manifest ."
He referred
to the period for which the defendants present appeal, after the publication of
the judgment of the first resources , and the opinion of the federal
prosecutors on the subject .
The judgment
is the document that summarizes the decisions taken and , by statute , must be
published within 60 days , or until November . After publication , the
condemned may submit infringing within 30 days . Then the prosecutor will have
another 15 days to present its position .
Only after
the outbreak of the parties ( defense and prosecution ) , which Fux , as
rapporteur , will check if the offender has obtained at least four affirmative
votes and if the feature is on schedule . Afterwards, you can still ask if you
find new evidence needed to make a vote . The next step is to take the case to
trial in plenary. This analysis phase has no pre-determined time and duration
depends only on himself relator .
Access:
20.09.2013
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Qualquer sugestão ou solicitação a respeito dos temas propostos, favor enviá-los. Grata!